Get Help With Essay: At the start of his book Naure’s Ghosts Mark Barrow describes seven basic arguments/rationales that naturalists developed for justifying the preservation of species from the 1770s to the 1970s (culminating in the U.S. Endangered Species Act of 1973): aesthetic, economic ecological evolutionary cultural scientific and ethical. How did each of these rationales relate to ecological ways of thinking?

Get Help With Essay: At the start of his book Naure’s Ghosts Mark Barrow describes seven basic arguments/rationales that naturalists developed for justifying the preservation of species from the 1770s to the 1970s (culminating in the U.S. Endangered Species Act of 1973): aesthetic, economic ecological evolutionary cultural scientific and ethical. How did each of these rationales relate to ecological ways of thinking?

Question: At the start of his book Naure’s Ghosts Mark Barrow describes seven basic arguments/rationales that naturalists developed for justifying the preservation of species from the 1770s to the 1970s (culminating in the U.S. Endangered Species Act of 1973): aesthetic, economic ecological evolutionary cultural scientific and ethical. How did each of these rationales relate to ecological ways of thinking? Choose three of these arguments excluding the ecological one, and discuss how each one compared and/or contrasted to ecological ways of thinking, as discussed by Sharon Kingsland in her article “Conveying the Intellectual Challenge of Ecology.”