Write a complete 2-4 pages paper that addresses the following: Utilize at least 2-3 credible sources to support the arguments presented in the paper. Make sure you cite them appropriately within your paper, and list them in APA format on your Reference page.
Look for common fallacies like:
- Sweeping generalizations – this fallacy occurs when an individual makes generalizations (usually stereotypical thinking)
- Equivocation – in this fallacy a person confuses two senses of the meaning of a word (like a free animal- is it free because it doesn’t cost anything or is it free because it is not in a “cage”?)
- Red herring – very common in political settings. This fallacy is a distraction (think of a big red fish – pretty distracting, right?)
- Circular thinking – typically restating the premise in the conclusion and creating a “circular” argument
- Appeals to authority – generally this fallacy considers an argument that we should listen to based on some “false” or “non” authority. Is this happening in your argument example?
- False cause – in this fallacy the writer or speaker attributes a “false” cause to some effect or result (often you will see superstitious thinking used here).
Does the argument align with a philosophical theory or theorist? Choose one philosophical theory or theorist and explain – from that perspective – what you would change to make the argument better. Think about the steps that you could use to improve the argument. For example, if you pick Socrates as a theorist thinks of how Socrates would reflect upon and engage the argument for change.
Please find an argument to analyze. Be creative! Some suggestions are to use a commercial, letter to the editor (or op/ed piece). Analyze the argument you choose as below:
- What is the main purpose of the argument?
- Is it inductive? Deductive?
- Are there any fallacies being used? If so, which ones?